Medicine testing on animals is inaccurate and does not benefit humans at all. Every single day in a year, animals including, but not limited to, dogs, cats, rabbits, mice, rats, hamsters, rhesus monkeys, and cattle are commonly used for vivisection.
Animals should not be used for medical experimentation because it is morally wrong, it is not helpful to scientific innovation, and there are other scientific inventions that could be utilized. Some might argue that most medical advances were made because experiments on animals were used.Animals are vital to the advancement of medical science, and must, therefore, continue to be used for medical research. It is quite easy to see that animal testing is the most humane option for humans, thus being the greatest solution. Young infants endured pain no one should ever feel.Rats, frogs, or rabbits may react to some chemical or drug, but this does not guarantee that the reaction will be the same or similar when tested on human beings. Because, humans are different from animals there is no need for animal testing. Medical workers should find more efficient ways to test products that will get them the right results.
Organizations like People for Ethical Treatment of Animals or PETA have been exposing and discouraging the support of these companies. This helps discourage companies to not animal test, which they should not. Companies should not test products on animals because.
Many animals are used for experiments and then killed. It is expensive to use model organisms as the animals must be purchased and then fed, housed and cared for. Some people will consider using animals in the lab to be immoral. Are animal experiments necessary?
The benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused and the ethical debate against animals testing. Also, there are alternative non-animals methods of testing. For instance, computerised human - patient simulators and In vitro testing which is defined as a research using human cells and tissue can be used instead of using animals.
But decisions about the use of animals should be based both on reason and values. It makes no sense to sacrifice future human health and well being by not using animals in research today. In fact, it would be immoral and selfish not to use animals in research today, given the harm that could accrue to future generations if such research were.
Accordingly, animal experimentation should not be banned. First, animal experiments should not be banned based on the fact that it has been beneficial to humans and animals. With the recent technological advancement, substantive accomplishment has been made in the field of human medicine and science. In this regard, the use of animal testing.
Some people regard testing on animals as completely wrong and inhumane and they believe is should not be allowed. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? In 21st century where the development of technology are in advance, people commonly kill animals for products that are used in life or to find something new to fulfill human necessity such as cosmetics or drugs.
Animal testing essay approaches. Basically, there are two approaches to writing essays on animal testing. You may choose a topic that considers the historical context, as methods of testing and other aspects that don’t require your personal point of view. When writing such an essay, remember that you need to be unprejudiced and objective, to explore the topic as a scientist.
Animal experiments - many Christians believe that animal experiments are acceptable if they result in benefits for human beings, eg advances in medical treatment. A general principle would be that.
Therefore, whether the world needs animals testing, or not will largely depend on individual assessments on the issue. References. Paul, J. (2001). Why Animal Experimentation Matters: The Use of Animals in Medical Research. New York: Transaction Publishers. Ratner, B. D. (2004). Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine.
If the application is also suitable to the animal, of course scientists should not be allowed to use animals in the experiments, but the laws of the animal world cannot offer that, because of the fact that wild animals prey on other animals for their food.
Animals Should be used for Research Testing Animal rights activists continually oppose the medical research that involves animals as test subjects. Too many people have come to the conclusion that medical researchers are cruel and inhumane. In many cases the good of the research is overlooked and the bad is used.
Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62).
Fortunately, a wealth of cutting-edge non-animal research methodologies promises a brighter future for both animal and human health. The following are common statements supporting animal experimentation followed by the arguments against them. “Every major medical advance is attributable to experiments on animals.” This is simply not true.
According to a Rogerian Essay, sides are supposed to be presented equally and show both sides of an argument. Although with animal testing animals should never be hurt, but there are certain reasons why people believe it is ok to do so. Animal Experimentation: In recent years, scientists and medical researchers have done experiments on animals.